[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181214.132551.1587998892072248943.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:25:51 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: arnd@...db.de
Cc: tgraf@...g.ch, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, neilb@...e.com,
tom@...ntonium.net, keescook@...omium.org, paulb@...lanox.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test_rhashtable: remove semaphore usage
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:17:20 +0100
> @@ -635,8 +636,9 @@ static int threadfunc(void *data)
> int i, step, err = 0, insert_retries = 0;
> struct thread_data *tdata = data;
>
> - up(&prestart_sem);
> - if (down_interruptible(&startup_sem))
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&startup_count))
> + wake_up(&startup_wait);
> + if (wait_event_interruptible(startup_wait, atomic_read(&startup_count) == -1))
> pr_err(" thread[%d]: down_interruptible failed\n", tdata->id);
Arnd, please adjust this pr_err() text to match the new code as pointed out by
Phil Sutter.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists