[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a02ir7sdxMi6BYd9_VhNQ-2ph8qa4TCnLBe25u+i-znUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 20:50:09 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test_rhashtable: remove semaphore usage
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:25 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 22:17:20 +0100
>
> > @@ -635,8 +636,9 @@ static int threadfunc(void *data)
> > int i, step, err = 0, insert_retries = 0;
> > struct thread_data *tdata = data;
> >
> > - up(&prestart_sem);
> > - if (down_interruptible(&startup_sem))
> > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&startup_count))
> > + wake_up(&startup_wait);
> > + if (wait_event_interruptible(startup_wait, atomic_read(&startup_count) == -1))
> > pr_err(" thread[%d]: down_interruptible failed\n", tdata->id);
>
> Arnd, please adjust this pr_err() text to match the new code as pointed out by
> Phil Sutter.
Done, and resent as v2. I also noticed that the version I sent did not apply
cleanly on current kernels, so I fixed that, and also added a 'goto out' in
the kthread after printing the error message, so an interrupted thread would
exist straight away.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists