netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] net: ipv4: do not handle duplicate fragments as overlapping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 15 Dec 2018 11:54:43 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     mkubecek@...e.cz
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        posk@...gle.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, gfigueira@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: ipv4: do not handle duplicate fragments as
 overlapping

From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:23:32 +0100 (CET)

> Since commit 7969e5c40dfd ("ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping
> segments.") IPv4 reassembly code drops the whole queue whenever an
> overlapping fragment is received. However, the test is written in a way
> which detects duplicate fragments as overlapping so that in environments
> with many duplicate packets, fragmented packets may be undeliverable.
> 
> Add an extra test and for (potentially) duplicate fragment, only drop the
> new fragment rather than the whole queue. Only starting offset and length
> are checked, not the contents of the fragments as that would be too
> expensive. For similar reason, linear list ("run") of a rbtree node is not
> iterated, we only check if the new fragment is a subset of the interval
> covered by existing consecutive fragments.
> 
> Fixes: 7969e5c40dfd ("ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping segments.")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
> 
> v2: instead of an exact check iterating through linear list of an rbtree
> node, only check if the new fragment is subset of the "run" (suggested
> by Eric Dumazet)

Applied and queued up for -stable, thank you.