[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181219.162009.1442218608345366100.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:20:09 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: make PHY_HALTED a transition
state to PHY_READY
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 07:50:43 +0100
> PHY_HALTED and PHY_READY both are non-started states and quite similar.
> Major difference is that phy_start() changes from PHY_HALTED to
> PHY_RESUMING which doesn't reconfigure aneg (what PHY_UP does).
>
> There's no guarantee that PHY registers are completely untouched when
> waking up from power-down, e.g. after system suspend. Therefore it's
> safer to reconfigure aneg also when starting from PHY_HALTED. This can
> be achieved and state machine made simpler by making PHY_HALTED going
> to PHY_READY after having stopped everything. Then the only way up is
> over PHY_UP. As part of the change PHY_HALTED is renamed to PHY_HALT to
> reflect that it is a transition state.
>
> After this change states PHY_RESUMING and PHY_CHANGELINK can be
> removed.
It looks like this series is still under discussion, so I'll hold on this
until the discussion meets some kind of agreement or conclusion.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists