[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190115.132949.1070071604329374251.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 13:29:49 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
idosch@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com,
ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 00/14] net: dsa: management mode for bcm_sf2
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:41:16 -0800
> This patch series does a number of things in order to enable
> management mode for bcm_sf2 (which could be easily extended to b53 with
> proper testing later on). In order to get there, there were several use
> cases that did not seem to be working correctly, such as:
>
> - VLAN devices on top of switch ports not being member of a bridge, with
> other switch ports being bridged, with the bridge having VLAN
> filtering enabled.
>
> - lack of multicast filtering by default on network ports which should
> be happening in order for the non-bridged DSA ports to behave strictly
> as Ethernet NICs with proper filering
>
> - improper or even lack of MDB programming requests for network ports
> that are not part of a bridge, or when the bridge has multicast
> snooping turned off
>
> Hopefully the changes to net/8021q and net/bridge are deemed acceptable.
>
> Here are some of the uses cases that were tested after this patch series
> (all commands are running on the device being tested) and
> iperf/ping/etc. should be working for/after all steps:
...
At a high level these changes look good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists