[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190115081548.GA3819@samu-ThinkPad-T480s>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:15:48 +0200
From: Samu Nuutamo <samu.nuutamo@...cit.fi>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Regression: mv88e6xxx packet loss after 4.18's PHYLINK merge
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:03:57AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Samu, is this fixed link using a GPIO to determine the link state? Does
> this patch help at all?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index 8a517d8fb9d1..9dedb9b22c13 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_mac_config(struct dsa_switch
> *ds, int port,
> return;
>
> if (mode == MLO_AN_FIXED) {
> - link = LINK_FORCED_UP;
> + link = state->link;
> speed = state->speed;
> duplex = state->duplex;
> } else if (!mv88e6xxx_phy_is_internal(ds, port)) {
Hi Florian,
I'm not 100% sure but it looks like GPIO is not used for that purpose.
I tested your patch but unfortunately it didn't work as the link keeps
cycling down/up.
- Samu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists