[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ+HfNigethi_fK-Cv5CskH9B7b+9Go1_qSVsGhvXnX1kbxykw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:06:47 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>, davidlee@...ive.com,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] riscv: set HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
Den tis 15 jan. 2019 kl 16:39 skrev Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>:
>
> Hmm, while the RISC-V spec requires misaligned load/store support,
> who says they are efficient? Maybe add a little comment that says
> on which cpus they are efficient.
Good point! :-) I need to check how other architectures does this.
Enabling it for *all* RV64 is probably not correct.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists