lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e3abd6b-346a-d0cf-c76d-2a5dfed24997@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 09:13:11 -0500
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        Bartek Kois <bartek.kois@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with queuing vlan tagged packets after migration from
 3.16.0 to 4.9.0

On 2019-01-15 1:19 p.m., Cong Wang wrote:

> 
> I never say it is broken. I am saying you only fix vlan case by
> introducing "vlanid XXX" and leave IPv4 option cases unfixed.


Let me see if we can get clarity.

IP options or TCP options typically work. You teach u32 what
to use to compute the next header. Are they now broken?

Maybe you mean that if one was to look for ip options in a
vlan tagged packet they wont find it? If yes, I would account
that to the brokenness of the vlans that we have now. But
once the vlan is popped the rule looking for protocol
ip should work. Is that broken now?

Note: Typically you will look for ip options
when you match an ip packet not when you match a vlan id etc.

> As I keep saying, this is a kinda design flaw of u32 probably
> can't be workarounded.

It is still useful to be able to match vlan ids using u32.

cheers,
jamal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ