netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: mdio_bus: add missing device_del() in mdiobus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190116161855.1d01e083@windsurf>
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 16:18:55 +0100
From:   Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: mdio_bus: add missing device_del() in
 mdiobus_register() error handling

Hello,

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:48:29 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> 
> However, i wounder if it makes sense to add a label before the
> existing device_del() at the end of the function, and convert this,
> and the case above into a goto? That might scale better, avoiding the
> same issue in the future?

That's another option indeed.

Hmm, now that I looked at it, I think we should use device_unregister()
instead. device_unregister() does both device_del() and put_device().

According to the comment above device_register(), put_device() should
always be called: "Always use put_device() to give up the reference
initialized in this function instead.".

What do you think?

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com