netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 13/29] arch: add split IPC system calls where needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190121115705.GB4020@osiris>
Date:   Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:57:05 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     y2038@...ts.linaro.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        mattst88@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org, monstr@...str.eu, paul.burton@...s.com,
        deller@....de, benh@...nel.crashing.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, dalias@...c.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, jcmvbkbc@...il.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, deepa.kernel@...il.com,
        ebiederm@...ssion.com, firoz.khan@...aro.org,
        linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/29] arch: add split IPC system calls where needed

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:18:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The IPC system call handling is highly inconsistent across architectures,
> some use sys_ipc, some use separate calls, and some use both.  We also
> have some architectures that require passing IPC_64 in the flags, and
> others that set it implicitly.
> 
> For the additon of a y2083 safe semtimedop() system call, I chose to only
> support the separate entry points, but that requires first supporting
> the regular ones with their own syscall numbers.
> 
> The IPC_64 is now implied by the new semctl/shmctl/msgctl system
> calls even on the architectures that require passing it with the ipc()
> multiplexer.
> 
> I'm not adding the new semtimedop() or semop() on 32-bit architectures,
> those will get implemented using the new semtimedop_time64() version
> that gets added along with the other time64 calls.
> Three 64-bit architectures (powerpc, s390 and sparc) get semtimedop().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> One aspect here that might be a bit controversial is the use of
> the same system call numbers across all architectures, synchronizing
> all of them with the x86-32 numbers. With the new syscall.tbl
> files, I hope we can just keep doing that in the future, and no
> longer require the architecture maintainers to assign a number.
> 
> This is mainly useful for implementers of the C libraries: if
> we can add future system calls everywhere at the same time, using
> a particular version of the kernel headers also guarantees that
> the system call number macro is visible.
> ---
>  arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl     | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl  | 13 +++++++++++++
>  arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl     | 12 ++++++++++++
>  arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl       | 11 +++++++++++
>  arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl    | 12 ++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl    | 11 +++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 81 insertions(+)

For the s390 bits:
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>