[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190121121154.GF2228@nanopsycho>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:11:54 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ariel Almog <ariela@...lanox.com>,
Aya Levin <ayal@...lanox.com>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net/mlx5e: Add TX reporter support
Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:32:07PM CET, eranbe@...lanox.com wrote:
>
>
>On 1/20/2019 1:06 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:59:18PM CET, eranbe@...lanox.com wrote:
[...]
>>> +static int
>>> +mlx5e_tx_reporter_build_diagnose_output(struct devlink_health_buffer *buffer,
>>> + u32 sqn, u8 state, u8 stopped)
>>> +{
>>> + int err, i;
>>> + int nest = 0;
>>> + char name[20];
>>> +
>>> + err = devlink_health_buffer_nest_start(buffer,
>>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_BUFFER_OBJECT);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto buffer_error;
>>> + nest++;
>>> +
>>> + err = devlink_health_buffer_nest_start(buffer,
>>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_BUFFER_OBJECT_PAIR);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto buffer_error;
>>> + nest++;
>>> +
>>> + sprintf(name, "SQ 0x%x", sqn);
>>
>> No. The whole idea of having the message build up with nested attributes
>> (json-like) was to avoid things like this. No sprintfs please. If you
>> want to do sprintf, most of the time you are doing something wrong.
>
>I wanted that each SQ object will have a unique name. But I can merge
>the sqn into its attributes instead.
Should be an array.
>
>>
>>
>>> + err = devlink_health_buffer_put_object_name(buffer, name);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto buffer_error;
>>> +
>>> + err = devlink_health_buffer_nest_start(buffer,
>>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_BUFFER_OBJECT_VALUE);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto buffer_error;
>>> + nest++;
>>> +
>>> + err = devlink_health_buffer_nest_start(buffer,
>>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_BUFFER_OBJECT);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto buffer_error;
>>> + nest++;
>>> +
>>> + err = devlink_health_buffer_nest_start(buffer,
>>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_BUFFER_OBJECT_PAIR);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto buffer_error;
>>> + nest++;
>>> +
>>> + err = devlink_health_buffer_put_object_name(buffer, "HW state");
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto buffer_error;
>>> +
>>> + err = devlink_health_buffer_nest_start(buffer,
>>> + DEVLINK_ATTR_HEALTH_BUFFER_OBJECT_VALUE);
>>
>> How could you put an object name and don't start nesting? It looks
>> implicit to me.
>
>I will add some helper functions that you could review. Just keep in
>mind the implicit nest start must come with implicit nest end, so it
>won't fit into every use...
You can do just object_start(), object_finish() or something like that.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists