lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 31 Jan 2019 13:52:22 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] sh_eth: offload RX checksum on R8A7740

Hello!

On 01/29/2019 09:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

>> The R-Mobile A1 (R8A7740) SoC manual describes the Ether MAC's RX checksum
>> offload the same way as it's implemented in the EtherAVB MAC...
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> Running netperf as described in patch 2/7, perf tells me there's a reduction
> for csum_partial from ca. 1.9% to 0.01%, so this feature seems to work.

   Hm, what about do_csum()?

> Hence:
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

   Thank you!
 
> However, while effective according to perf results, using ethtool to
> enable/disable
> the feature prints an error message:
> 
> root@...adillo:~# ethtool -K eth0 rx on
> Cannot get device udp-fragmentation-offload settings: Operation not supported
> Cannot get device udp-fragmentation-offload settings: Operation not supported
> root@...adillo:~# ethtool -K eth0 rx off
> Cannot get device udp-fragmentation-offload settings: Operation not supported
> Cannot get device udp-fragmentation-offload settings: Operation not supported
> root@...adillo:~#
> 
> Do you have any clue?

   No (I'm seeing the same).
 
> Does this needs testing on R-Mobile A1 with VLAN enabled, too, or is that
> independent from the underlying sh-eth hardware version?

   It's dependent...

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert

MBR, Sergei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ