[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190201231007.GB5593@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 00:10:07 +0100
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] tools/bpf: move libbpf pr_* debug print
functions to headers
Em Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:47:31AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> @@ -698,13 +695,13 @@ struct btf_ext *btf_ext__new(__u8 *data, __u32 size, btf_print_fn_t err_log)
> if (!btf_ext)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - err = btf_ext_copy_func_info(btf_ext, data, size, err_log);
> + err = btf_ext_copy_func_info(btf_ext, data, size);
> if (err) {
> btf_ext__free(btf_ext);
One thing I noticed whas that the class + __ + method is not being
consistently followed, will this be dealt with in a followup patch, i.e.
to make this consistently use the format used in the
btf_ext__free(btf_ext) case?
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
>
> - err = btf_ext_copy_line_info(btf_ext, data, size, err_log);
> + err = btf_ext_copy_line_info(btf_ext, data, size);
> if (err) {
> btf_ext__free(btf_ext);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists