netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/8] ethtool: add compat for devlink info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190201075714.GA2401@nanopsycho>
Date:   Fri, 1 Feb 2019 08:57:14 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, lkp@...el.com,
        kbuild-all@...org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        mkubecek@...e.cz, eugenem@...com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/8] ethtool: add compat for devlink info

Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 06:29:25PM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:25:08 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:23:03 -0800 (PST), David Miller wrote:
>> > From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 00:19:33 +0800
>> >   
>> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> > > 
>> > >    m68k-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/rtc/proc.o: in function `is_rtc_hctosys.isra.0':
>> > >    proc.c:(.text+0x178): undefined reference to `strcmp'
>> > >    m68k-linux-gnu-ld: net/core/ethtool.o: in function `ethtool_get_drvinfo':    
>> > >>> ethtool.c:(.text+0xc08): undefined reference to `devlink_compat_running_version'    
>> > 
>> > Missing string.h include perhaps?  
>> 
>> Yeah, that one looks like existing m68k bug, but also I think I need to
>> cater to the DEVLINK=m case since ethtool code is always built in we
>> can't use the MAY_USE_DEVLINK trick :S
>
>I think we have to do this:
>
>#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_NET_DEVLINK)
>void devlink_compat_running_version(struct net_device *dev,
>				    char *buf, size_t len);
>#else
>static inline void
>devlink_compat_running_version(struct net_device *dev, char *buf, size_t len)
>{
>}
>#endif
>
>Jiri, any objections?

Np.