[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d8c0eff-00cd-31c7-9906-89ff9d3c7dd4@bell.net>
Date:   Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:52:10 -0500
From:   John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phylink: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Revise irq setup ordering
Hi Andrew,
On 2019-02-04 2:35 p.m., Andrew Lunn wrote:
> The change to the interrupt handler i'm pretty sure is wrong. You have
> to accept with edge interrupts you are going to loose interrupts.
Can you be more specific regarding what you think is wrong with this hunk?
I can see that an interrupt might be handled twice if the source wasn't
cleared before interrupts
are re-enabled but I think that would also occur with level interrupts.
Dave
-- 
John David Anglin  dave.anglin@...l.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
