[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d0ccee0-7ff0-ea0e-2181-2aa2dd256af3@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 19:27:07 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net_sched: add performance counters for basic
filter
On 02/03/2019 11:35 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 10:35 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>>> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>>> + struct tc_basic_pcnt *pf = per_cpu_ptr(f->pf, cpu);
>>> +
>>> + gpf.rcnt += pf->rcnt;
>>> + gpf.rhit += pf->rhit;
>>> + }
>>>
>> This looks missing some synchronization of some sort for 32bit kernels ?
>
> I don't know, u32 filter has literally same code:
>
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> int i;
> struct tc_u32_pcnt *pf = per_cpu_ptr(n->pf, cpu);
>
> gpf->rcnt += pf->rcnt;
> gpf->rhit += pf->rhit;
> for (i = 0; i < n->sel.nkeys; i++)
> gpf->kcnts[i] += pf->kcnts[i];
> }
>
> which has been there for years...
>
Then u32 (or at least CONFIG_CLS_U32_PERF) was also broken.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists