[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lyzhrbsf5u.fsf@netronome.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 16:15:57 +0000
From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: bpf: fix JMP32 code-gen
Heiko Carstens writes:
> Commit 626a5f66da0d19 ("s390: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32") added
> JMP32 code-gen support for s390. However it triggers the warning below
> due to some unusual gotos in the original s390 bpf jit code.
>
> Add a couple of additional "is_jmp32" initializations to fix this.
> Also fix the wrong opcode for the "llilf" instruction that was
> introduced with the same commit.
>
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_jit_insn':
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:248:55: warning: 'is_jmp32' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> _EMIT6(op1 | reg(b1, b2) << 16 | (rel & 0xffff), op2 | mask); \
> ^
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:1211:8: note: 'is_jmp32' was declared here
> bool is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
>
> Fixes: 626a5f66da0d19 ("s390: bpf: implement jitting of JMP32")
> Cc: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Thanks for fixing this.
Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Regards,
Jiong
> ---
> arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index ce9defdff62a..51dd0267d014 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -1154,7 +1154,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
> mask = 0x7000; /* jnz */
> if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32) {
> /* llilf %w1,imm (load zero extend imm) */
> - EMIT6_IMM(0xc0010000, REG_W1, imm);
> + EMIT6_IMM(0xc00f0000, REG_W1, imm);
> /* nr %w1,%dst */
> EMIT2(0x1400, REG_W1, dst_reg);
> } else {
> @@ -1216,6 +1216,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
> REG_W1, dst_reg, src_reg);
> goto branch_oc;
> branch_ks:
> + is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
> /* lgfi %w1,imm (load sign extend imm) */
> EMIT6_IMM(0xc0010000, REG_W1, imm);
> /* crj or cgrj %dst,%w1,mask,off */
> @@ -1223,6 +1224,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
> dst_reg, REG_W1, i, off, mask);
> break;
> branch_ku:
> + is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
> /* lgfi %w1,imm (load sign extend imm) */
> EMIT6_IMM(0xc0010000, REG_W1, imm);
> /* clrj or clgrj %dst,%w1,mask,off */
> @@ -1230,11 +1232,13 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, int i
> dst_reg, REG_W1, i, off, mask);
> break;
> branch_xs:
> + is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
> /* crj or cgrj %dst,%src,mask,off */
> EMIT6_PCREL(0xec000000, (is_jmp32 ? 0x0076 : 0x0064),
> dst_reg, src_reg, i, off, mask);
> break;
> branch_xu:
> + is_jmp32 = BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_JMP32;
> /* clrj or clgrj %dst,%src,mask,off */
> EMIT6_PCREL(0xec000000, (is_jmp32 ? 0x0077 : 0x0065),
> dst_reg, src_reg, i, off, mask);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists