| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:29:56 +0100
From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ISSUE][4.20.6] mlx5 and checksum failures
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:01 PM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:43 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:17 AM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:00 PM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > It changes directly after the first hw checksum failure, I don't know why =/
> > > >
> > > > weird, Maybe a real check-summing issue/corruption on the PCI ?!
> > >
> > > Actually, it seems to have been introduced in 4.20.6 - 4.20.5 works just fine
> > Great, the difference is only 120 patches.
> > that is bisect-able, it will only take 5 iterations to find the
> > offending commit.
>
> I just wish it wasn't a server that takes, what feels like 5 minutes to boot...
>
> All of these seas of sensors 2d and 3d... =P
>
> But, yep, that's the plan
Huh, spent most of the day with two bisects and none of them yielded
any results....
Looks like I'll have to start investigating the elrepo kernel-ml build =(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists