lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAA85sZvw9DouvMLT8+TgS5Y-0kG-XSVbNmBweJVBjOSNQPovRw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 16:54:32 +0100 From: Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>, Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [ISSUE][4.20.6] mlx5 and checksum failures On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:29 PM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> wrote > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:01 PM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 7:43 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:17 AM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 2:01 AM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:00 PM Ian Kumlien <ian.kumlien@...il.com> wrote: > > > > > > It changes directly after the first hw checksum failure, I don't know why =/ > > > > > > > > > > weird, Maybe a real check-summing issue/corruption on the PCI ?! > > > > > > > > Actually, it seems to have been introduced in 4.20.6 - 4.20.5 works just fine > > > > Great, the difference is only 120 patches. > > > that is bisect-able, it will only take 5 iterations to find the > > > offending commit. > > > > I just wish it wasn't a server that takes, what feels like 5 minutes to boot... > > > > All of these seas of sensors 2d and 3d... =P > > > > But, yep, that's the plan > > Huh, spent most of the day with two bisects and none of them yielded > any results.... > > Looks like I'll have to start investigating the elrepo kernel-ml build =( Just realized that it's not an entirely fair comparison - since retpolines wasn't enabled, damned old compilers...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists