netdev - Re: Kernel memory corruption in CIPSO labeled TCP packets processing.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSjtQRGBUHvx73eVg32NMm4UN4qqaOXFyB9BMSx0Bz7dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:37:25 -0500
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Nazarov Sergey <s-nazarov@...dex.ru>
Cc:     "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "selinux@...r.kernel.org" <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel memory corruption in CIPSO labeled TCP packets processing.

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:20 AM Nazarov Sergey <s-nazarov@...dex.ru> wrote:
> 31.01.2019, 05:10, "Paul Moore" <paul@...l-moore.com>:
> > This isn't how the rest of the stack works, look at
> > ip_local_deliver_finish() for one example. Perhaps the behavior you
> > are proposing is correct, but please show me where in the various RFC
> > specs it is defined so that I can better understand why it should work
> > this way.
> > --
> > paul moore
> > www.paul-moore.com
>
> Sorry, I was inattentive. ip_options_compile modifies srr option data, only if
> skb is NULL. My last message could be ignored.

Hi Nazarov,

Do you plan on submitting these patches as a proper patchset for
review and merging?

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com