netdev - Re: Kernel memory corruption in CIPSO labeled TCP packets processing.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:21:20 +0300
From:   Nazarov Sergey <s-nazarov@...dex.ru>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "selinux@...r.kernel.org" <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel memory corruption in CIPSO labeled TCP packets processing.

Hi, Paul!
What I need to do for this?

11.02.2019, 23:37, "Paul Moore" <paul@...l-moore.com>:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:20 AM Nazarov Sergey <s-nazarov@...dex.ru> wrote:
>>  31.01.2019, 05:10, "Paul Moore" <paul@...l-moore.com>:
>>  > This isn't how the rest of the stack works, look at
>>  > ip_local_deliver_finish() for one example. Perhaps the behavior you
>>  > are proposing is correct, but please show me where in the various RFC
>>  > specs it is defined so that I can better understand why it should work
>>  > this way.
>>  > --
>>  > paul moore
>>  > www.paul-moore.com
>>
>>  Sorry, I was inattentive. ip_options_compile modifies srr option data, only if
>>  skb is NULL. My last message could be ignored.
>
> Hi Nazarov,
>
> Do you plan on submitting these patches as a proper patchset for
> review and merging?
>
> --
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com