lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bdfe4da-6c27-c07c-2eb1-0cc13007a6d9@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 22:34:34 +0100
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3 net-next] net: phy: disregard "Clause 22 registers
 present" bit in get_phy_c45_devs_in_pkg

On 11.02.2019 22:19, David Miller wrote:
> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 20:19:17 +0100
> 
>> Bit 0 in register 1.5 doesn't represent a device but is a flag that
>> Clause 22 registers are present. Therefore disregard this bit when
>> populating the device list. If code needs this information it
>> should read register 1.5 directly instead of accessing the device
>> list.
>> Because this bit doesn't represent a device don't define a
>> MDIO_MMD_XYZ constant, just define a MDIO_DEVS_XYZ constant for
>> the flag in the device list bitmap.
>  ...
> 
> This doesn't apply cleanly to net-next, please respin.
> 
You applied v2 already, and with a follow-up patch I "upgraded"
it to v3. So you can disregard this series.

> Thanks.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ