netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Revert wake_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:09:23 +0530
From:   Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "michael.chan@...adcom.com" <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Revert wake_on_lan devlink parameter

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 12:37 PM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Vasundhara Volam <vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com>
> Date: Fri,  8 Feb 2019 14:43:08 +0530
>
> > As per discussion with Jakub Kicinski and Michal Kubecek,
> > this will be better addressed by soon-too-come ethtool netlink
> > API with additional indication that given WoL configuration request
> > is supposed to be persisted.
> >
> > Retain bnxt_en code for devlink port param table registration.
> > There will be follow up patches to add some devlink port params
> > for bnxt_en driver.
>
> Please fix the kbuild robot reported build failure and repost.
David, second patch in this patchset has already taken care of all
this failures.
Could you please apply both patches together?