[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190213034104.GA8751@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 20:41:04 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Cc: dledford@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mustafa.ismail@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 03/19] net/ice: Add support for ice peer devices and drivers
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:43:46PM -0600, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> From: Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com>
>
> The E800 series of Ethernet devices has multiple hardware blocks, of
> which RDMA is one. The RDMA block isn't interfaced directly to PCI
> or any other bus. The RDMA driver (irdma) thus depends on the ice
> driver to provide access to the RDMA hardware block.
>
> The ice driver first creates a pseudo bus and then creates and attaches
> a new device to the pseudo bus using device_register(). This new device
> is referred to as a "peer device" and the associated driver (i.e. irdma)
> is a "peer driver" to ice. Once the peer driver loads, it can call
> ice driver functions exposed to it via struct ice_ops. Similarly, ice can
> call peer driver functions exposed to it via struct ice_peer_ops.
This seems quite big for this straightforward description..
I was going to say I like the idea of using the driver model to
connect the drivers, but if it takes so much code ...
> + /* check for reset in progress before proceeding */
> + pf = pci_get_drvdata(peer_dev->pdev);
> + for (i = 0; i < ICE_MAX_RESET_WAIT; i++) {
> + if (!ice_is_reset_in_progress(pf->state))
> + break;
> + msleep(100);
> + }
Use proper locking, not loops with sleeps.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists