[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190215135056.18376-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 21:50:56 +0800
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] bonding: use mutex lock in bond_get_stats()
With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y, we find following stack,
BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#0, ip/16047
lock: 0xffff803f5febc998, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: ip/16047, .owner_cpu: 0
CPU: 1 PID: 16047 Comm: ip Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 4.19.12.aarch64 #1
Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDA, BIOS TA BIOS TaiShan 2280 V2 - B900 01/29/2019
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0
show_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack+0x90/0xbc
spin_dump+0x84/0xa8
do_raw_spin_unlock+0xf8/0x100
_raw_spin_unlock+0x20/0x30
bond_get_stats+0x110/0x140 [bonding]
rtnl_fill_stats+0x50/0x150
rtnl_fill_ifinfo+0x4d4/0xd18
rtnl_dump_ifinfo+0x200/0x3a8
netlink_dump+0x100/0x2b0
netlink_recvmsg+0x310/0x3e8
sock_recvmsg+0x58/0x68
___sys_recvmsg+0xd0/0x278
__sys_recvmsg+0x74/0xd0
__arm64_sys_recvmsg+0x2c/0x38
el0_svc_common+0x7c/0x118
el0_svc_handler+0x30/0x40
el0_svc+0x8/0xc
and then lead to softlockup issue, fix this by using mutex lock instead
of spin lock.
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
---
Not sure if this is right fix, please correct me if I'm wrong.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 +++---
include/net/bonding.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 485462d3087f..3f7849525759 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3452,7 +3452,7 @@ static void bond_get_stats(struct net_device *bond_dev,
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave;
- spin_lock_nested(&bond->stats_lock, bond_get_nest_level(bond_dev));
+ mutex_lock_nested(&bond->stats_lock, bond_get_nest_level(bond_dev));
memcpy(stats, &bond->bond_stats, sizeof(*stats));
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -3468,7 +3468,7 @@ static void bond_get_stats(struct net_device *bond_dev,
rcu_read_unlock();
memcpy(&bond->bond_stats, stats, sizeof(*stats));
- spin_unlock(&bond->stats_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->stats_lock);
}
static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
@@ -4284,7 +4284,7 @@ void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
spin_lock_init(&bond->mode_lock);
- spin_lock_init(&bond->stats_lock);
+ mutex_init(&bond->stats_lock);
bond->params = bonding_defaults;
/* Initialize pointers */
diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
index b46d68acf701..3a6dbb2b376c 100644
--- a/include/net/bonding.h
+++ b/include/net/bonding.h
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ struct bonding {
* ALB mode (6) - to sync the use and modifications of its hash table
*/
spinlock_t mode_lock;
- spinlock_t stats_lock;
+ struct mutex stats_lock;
u8 send_peer_notif;
u8 igmp_retrans;
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists