netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: make LWTUNNEL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee084cee-9523-07db-5faa-99288dca02d5@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Sat, 16 Feb 2019 01:16:40 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Oskolkov <posk@...k.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf: make LWTUNNEL_BPF dependent on INET

On 02/15/2019 11:55 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 2/15/19 9:51 AM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
>> Lightweight tunnels are L3 constructs that are used with IP/IP6.
>>
>> For example, lwtunnel_xmit is called from ip_output.c and
>> ip6_output.c only.
>>
>> Make the dependency explicit at least for LWT-BPF, as now they
>> call into IP routing.
>>
>> V2: added "Reported-by" below.
>>
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
> 
> Yes, that works.  Thanks.
> 
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> # build-tested

Applied, thanks!