netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/2] tcp: fix possible crash in tcp_v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190218.115942.2123254635644904862.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 18 Feb 2019 11:59:42 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:     edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com,
        ycheng@...gle.com, soukjin.bae@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] tcp: fix possible crash in tcp_v4_err()

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:20:21 -0800

> 
> 
> On 02/17/2019 03:47 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:36:19 -0800
>> 
>>> soukjin bae reported a crash in tcp_v4_err() that we
>>> root caused to a missing initialization.
>>>
>>> Second patch adds a sanity check in tcp_v4_err() to avoid
>>> future potential problems. Ignoring an ICMP message
>>> is probably better than crashing a machine.
>> 
>> Series applied, thanks Eric.
>> 
>> Want me to queue these up for -stable?
>> 
> 
> Yes please, I put no Fixes: tag because it seemed to be a day-0 bug.

Done.