netdev - Re: [PATCH net 0/2] tcp: fix possible crash in tcp_v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8e6280f3-ea5b-48bd-4dc0-da134d4125d2@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 17 Feb 2019 18:20:21 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
        ncardwell@...gle.com, ycheng@...gle.com, soukjin.bae@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] tcp: fix possible crash in tcp_v4_err()



On 02/17/2019 03:47 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:36:19 -0800
> 
>> soukjin bae reported a crash in tcp_v4_err() that we
>> root caused to a missing initialization.
>>
>> Second patch adds a sanity check in tcp_v4_err() to avoid
>> future potential problems. Ignoring an ICMP message
>> is probably better than crashing a machine.
> 
> Series applied, thanks Eric.
> 
> Want me to queue these up for -stable?
> 

Yes please, I put no Fixes: tag because it seemed to be a day-0 bug.

Thanks !