netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] nfp: devlink: allow flashing the device via devlink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Feb 2019 09:37:49 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, mkubecek@...e.cz, andrew@...n.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] nfp: devlink: allow flashing the device via
 devlink

Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 01:49:26AM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 10:19:42 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:44:29PM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>> >On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:15:14 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:  
>> >> > static const struct ethtool_ops nfp_net_ethtool_ops = {    
>> >> 
>> >> Why don't you use the compat fallback? I think you should.  
>> >
>> >You and Michal both asked the same so let me answer the first to ask :)
>> >- if devlink is built as a module the fallback is not reachable.  
>> 
>> So the fallback is not really good as you can't use it for real drivers
>> anyway. Odd. Maybe we should compile devlink in without possibility to
>> have it as module.
>
>Ack, I'll make devlink a bool.

Thanks!

>
>I need a little extra time, I forgot that nfp's flower offload still
>doesn't register all ports (using your port flavour infrastructure).

Finally :)