lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0401MB24962D52E53B9637922BD4CBF17E0@VI1PR0401MB2496.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:10:11 +0000
From:   Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Add bindings for mdio mux consumers



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:andrew@...n.ch]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 February, 2019 07:15 PM
> To: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>
> Cc: Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>; Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>; Florian
> Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>; Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>; Rob
> Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Add bindings for mdio mux consumers
> 
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:59:19PM +0000, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > When we use the bindings defined in
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux
> > to define mdio mux in producer and consumer terms, it results in two
> > devices. one is mux producer and other is mux consumer.
> >
> > Add the bindings needed for Mdio mux consumer devices.
> 
> Hi Pankaj
> 
> Please thread this binding patch with the code which implements the binding.
> The two should be reviewed together.

OK. If you have any comments about this patch, then please let me know.
I will incorporate these when I send both patches together.

> 
> Thanks
> 	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ