[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190222.125556.1329078531429080923.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:55:56 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com
Cc: maximmi@...lanox.com, saeedm@...lanox.com, willemb@...gle.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eranbe@...lanox.com, tariqt@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] AF_PACKET transport_offset fix
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:20:01 -0500
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 7:40 AM Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch series contains the implementation of the RFC that was posted
>> on this mailing list previously:
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg541709.html
>>
>> It fixes having incorrect skb->transport_header values in cases when
>> dissect fails. Having correct values set by the kernel fixes mlx5
>> operation and allows to remove some unnecessary code flows in mlx5.
>>
>> v2 changes:
>>
>> - Rebase against the fresh net-next.
>> - Don't return bool from skb_probe_transport_header (and don't rename
>> the function).
>> - WARN_ON_ONCE and error path in case of GSO without the L4 header.
>>
>> Maxim Mikityanskiy (7):
>> net: Don't set transport offset to invalid value
>> net: Introduce parse_protocol header_ops callback
>> net/ethernet: Add parse_protocol header_ops support
>> net/packet: Ask driver for protocol if not provided by user
>> net/packet: Remove redundant skb->protocol set
>> net/mlx5e: Remove the wrong assumption about transport offset
>> net/mlx5e: Trust kernel regarding transport offset
>
> For the series: Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Series applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists