netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] M_CAN Framework re-write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 24 Feb 2019 12:27:34 +0100
From:   Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, mkl@...gutronix.de,
        davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] M_CAN Framework re-write

Hello Dan,

Am 22.02.19 um 18:05 schrieb Dan Murphy:
> Wolfgang
> 
> On 2/22/19 6:50 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Wolfgang
>>
>> On 2/22/19 3:38 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> Hello Dan,
>>>
>>> what kernel version is that patch series for. I have problems to apply it!
>>>
>>
>> It is based off of Master
>>
>> commit 2137397c92aec3713fa10be3c9b830f9a1674e60 (linux_master/master)
>>
>> And I successfully rebased on top of
>>
>> commit 8a61716ff2ab23eddd1f7a05a075a374e4d0c3d4 (linux_master/master)
>> Merge tag 'ceph-for-5.0-rc8' of git://github.com/ceph/ceph-client
>>
> 
> I just pulled these patches and they applied fine to the top commit of linux master
> 
> Do I need to rebase on top of a for-next branch for you?

No, I can apply the series now as well.

Wolfgang,