netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] M_CAN Framework re-write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20576c37-bea8-f598-21e8-6e01c2e87e76@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:39:13 -0600
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] M_CAN Framework re-write

Wolfgang

On 2/24/19 5:27 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello Dan,
> 
> Am 22.02.19 um 18:05 schrieb Dan Murphy:
>> Wolfgang
>>
>> On 2/22/19 6:50 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Wolfgang
>>>
>>> On 2/22/19 3:38 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>>> Hello Dan,
>>>>
>>>> what kernel version is that patch series for. I have problems to apply it!
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is based off of Master
>>>
>>> commit 2137397c92aec3713fa10be3c9b830f9a1674e60 (linux_master/master)
>>>
>>> And I successfully rebased on top of
>>>
>>> commit 8a61716ff2ab23eddd1f7a05a075a374e4d0c3d4 (linux_master/master)
>>> Merge tag 'ceph-for-5.0-rc8' of git://github.com/ceph/ceph-client
>>>
>>
>> I just pulled these patches and they applied fine to the top commit of linux master
>>
>> Do I need to rebase on top of a for-next branch for you?
> 
> No, I can apply the series now as well.
> 

Good.  Just commenting to bump this in my email list.

Waiting on comments.

Dan

> Wolfgang,
> 


-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy