lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190228190645.34c21d8b@cakuba.netronome.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 19:06:45 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/6] i40e: use extack for bpf errors On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:54:38 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > @@ -12140,12 +12144,14 @@ static int i40e_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > struct i40e_netdev_priv *np = netdev_priv(dev); > struct i40e_vsi *vsi = np->vsi; > > - if (vsi->type != I40E_VSI_MAIN) > + if (vsi->type != I40E_VSI_MAIN) { > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(xdp->extack, "XDP not allowed on VF"); Is that right? Intel tends to have separate drivers for VFs, I think the i40evf got renamed to iavf. I think it would be a good idea to CC maintainers on the driver patches. > return -EINVAL; > + } >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists