[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190302183720.3220-4-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 19:37:14 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 23/29] netfilter: bridge: Don't sabotage nf_hook calls for an l3mdev slave
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Followup to a173f066c7cf ("netfilter: bridge: Don't sabotage nf_hook
calls from an l3mdev"). Some packets (e.g., ndisc) do not have the skb
device flipped to the l3mdev (e.g., VRF) device. Update ip_sabotage_in
to not drop packets for slave devices too. Currently, neighbor
solicitation packets for 'dev -> bridge (addr) -> vrf' setups are getting
dropped. This patch enables IPv6 communications for bridges with an
address that are enslaved to a VRF.
Fixes: 73e20b761acf ("net: vrf: Add support for PREROUTING rules on vrf device")
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index 40d058378b52..9d34de68571b 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -831,7 +831,8 @@ static unsigned int ip_sabotage_in(void *priv,
struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
if (nf_bridge && !nf_bridge->in_prerouting &&
- !netif_is_l3_master(skb->dev)) {
+ !netif_is_l3_master(skb->dev) &&
+ !netif_is_l3_slave(skb->dev)) {
state->okfn(state->net, state->sk, skb);
return NF_STOLEN;
}
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists