netdev - Re: [PATCH net] selinux: add the missing walk_size + len check in selinux_sctp_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSy0X1Pz+C8UqpiU32obSMZoBASzoP543qbLLWGSxYEOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:11:32 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:     selinux@...r.kernel.org, network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@...nternet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selinux: add the missing walk_size + len check in selinux_sctp_bind_connect

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:47 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:08 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 12:07:34AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > > As does in __sctp_connect(), when checking addrs in a while loop, after
> > > get the addr len according to sa_family, it's necessary to do the check
> > > walk_size + af->sockaddr_len > addrs_size to make sure it won't access
> > > an out-of-bounds addr.
> > >
> > > The same thing is needed in selinux_sctp_bind_connect(), otherwise an
> > > out-of-bounds issue can be triggered:
> > >
> > >   [14548.772313] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in selinux_sctp_bind_connect+0x1aa/0x1f0
> > >   [14548.927083] Call Trace:
> > >   [14548.938072]  dump_stack+0x9a/0xe9
> > >   [14548.953015]  print_address_description+0x65/0x22e
> > >   [14548.996524]  kasan_report.cold.6+0x92/0x1a6
> > >   [14549.015335]  selinux_sctp_bind_connect+0x1aa/0x1f0
> > >   [14549.036947]  security_sctp_bind_connect+0x58/0x90
> > >   [14549.058142]  __sctp_setsockopt_connectx+0x5a/0x150 [sctp]
> > >   [14549.081650]  sctp_setsockopt.part.24+0x1322/0x3ce0 [sctp]
> > >
> > > Fixes: d452930fd3b9 ("selinux: Add SCTP support")
> > > Reported-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
>
> Thanks, this patch looks good to me.
>
> > Paul, how can we get this into -stable trees? SELinux process may be
> > different from -net trees.
>
> For patches that warrant inclusion in -stable, I merge them into the
> current selinux/stable-X.Y and send it up to Linus once it passes some
> basic sanity tests.  Since we're still only half-way through the merge
> window, and this is an obvious bug fix, I think this qualifies as
> -stable material.
>
> I'm traveling at the moment with not-so-great connectivity, but I'll
> get this merged and verified early next week.

FYI, I just merged this into selinux/stable-5.1.  Assuming it tests
okay (and I can't imagine it would cause a regression), I'll send it
to Linus tomorrow.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com