[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190311234942.GG13515@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:49:42 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@...nternet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selinux: add the missing walk_size + len check in
selinux_sctp_bind_connect
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 04:11:32PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:47 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:08 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > <marcelo.leitner@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 12:07:34AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > > > As does in __sctp_connect(), when checking addrs in a while loop, after
> > > > get the addr len according to sa_family, it's necessary to do the check
> > > > walk_size + af->sockaddr_len > addrs_size to make sure it won't access
> > > > an out-of-bounds addr.
> > > >
> > > > The same thing is needed in selinux_sctp_bind_connect(), otherwise an
> > > > out-of-bounds issue can be triggered:
> > > >
> > > > [14548.772313] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in selinux_sctp_bind_connect+0x1aa/0x1f0
> > > > [14548.927083] Call Trace:
> > > > [14548.938072] dump_stack+0x9a/0xe9
> > > > [14548.953015] print_address_description+0x65/0x22e
> > > > [14548.996524] kasan_report.cold.6+0x92/0x1a6
> > > > [14549.015335] selinux_sctp_bind_connect+0x1aa/0x1f0
> > > > [14549.036947] security_sctp_bind_connect+0x58/0x90
> > > > [14549.058142] __sctp_setsockopt_connectx+0x5a/0x150 [sctp]
> > > > [14549.081650] sctp_setsockopt.part.24+0x1322/0x3ce0 [sctp]
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: d452930fd3b9 ("selinux: Add SCTP support")
> > > > Reported-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@...hat.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> >
> > Thanks, this patch looks good to me.
> >
> > > Paul, how can we get this into -stable trees? SELinux process may be
> > > different from -net trees.
> >
> > For patches that warrant inclusion in -stable, I merge them into the
> > current selinux/stable-X.Y and send it up to Linus once it passes some
> > basic sanity tests. Since we're still only half-way through the merge
> > window, and this is an obvious bug fix, I think this qualifies as
> > -stable material.
> >
> > I'm traveling at the moment with not-so-great connectivity, but I'll
> > get this merged and verified early next week.
>
> FYI, I just merged this into selinux/stable-5.1. Assuming it tests
> okay (and I can't imagine it would cause a regression), I'll send it
> to Linus tomorrow.
Thanks Paul.
Marcelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists