lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190321160057.57u7ahijddqwtfdd@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:00:59 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Petar Penkov <peterpenkov96@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next v2 1/9] net: introduce __init_skb{,_data,_shinfo}
 helpers

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 08:44:33AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> 
> If we can agree that we switch everything to xpd-like, do we deprecate the
> skb-one?

This whole discussion that have been going on for long time is an indication
that initial bpf flow dissector concept was not thought through
and I regret on merging it in the first place.
Adding more hacks on top of it with fake skbs is not going to make it any better.
Since it's been in the official release we cannot remove it now.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ