[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR05MB58792D557BAA7967A0B1ACA5D15F0@AM6PR05MB5879.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:46:47 +0000
From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: New xdpsock sample
Hi Magnus and all,
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1045921/
This series removes xdpsock_kern.c and replaces it by the bytecode
hardcoded in libbpf. I am wondering whether there is some real issue
with having the XDP program in a separate C file, just like before,
because this change made it far less convenient to modify the XDP
program. Could you give any comments?
Thanks,
Max
Powered by blists - more mailing lists