lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR05MB58792D557BAA7967A0B1ACA5D15F0@AM6PR05MB5879.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:46:47 +0000
From:   Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>
To:     Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: New xdpsock sample

Hi Magnus and all,

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1045921/

This series removes xdpsock_kern.c and replaces it by the bytecode
hardcoded in libbpf. I am wondering whether there is some real issue
with having the XDP program in a separate C file, just like before,
because this change made it far less convenient to modify the XDP
program. Could you give any comments?

Thanks,
Max

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ