[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190328155027.rm6zfeece7wlhn2i@ast-mbp>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:50:30 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
jiri@...lanox.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 13/13] net: Use common nexthop init and
release helpers
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 08:53:58PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
>
> With fib_nh_common in place, move common initialization and release
> code into helpers used by both ipv4 and ipv6. For the moment, the init
> is just the lwt encap and the release is both the netdev reference and
> the the lwt state reference. More will be added later.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> ---
> include/net/ip_fib.h | 4 ++++
> net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> net/ipv6/route.c | 21 ++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip_fib.h b/include/net/ip_fib.h
> index 70548b1a6322..12a6d759cf57 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip_fib.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip_fib.h
> @@ -441,6 +441,10 @@ int fib_nh_init(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *fib_nh,
> struct fib_config *cfg, int nh_weight,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> void fib_nh_release(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *fib_nh);
> +int fib_nh_common_init(struct fib_nh_common *nhc, struct nlattr *fc_encap,
> + u16 fc_encap_type, void *cfg, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> +void fib_nh_common_release(struct fib_nh_common *nhc);
>
> /* Exported by fib_trie.c */
> void fib_trie_init(void);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> index e9992407863e..df777af7e278 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
> @@ -204,16 +204,22 @@ static void rt_fibinfo_free_cpus(struct rtable __rcu * __percpu *rtp)
> free_percpu(rtp);
> }
>
> +void fib_nh_common_release(struct fib_nh_common *nhc)
> +{
> + if (nhc->nhc_dev)
> + dev_put(nhc->nhc_dev);
> +
> + lwtstate_put(nhc->nhc_lwtstate);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fib_nh_common_release);
> +
> void fib_nh_release(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *fib_nh)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_CLASSID
> if (fib_nh->nh_tclassid)
> net->ipv4.fib_num_tclassid_users--;
> #endif
> - if (fib_nh->fib_nh_dev)
> - dev_put(fib_nh->fib_nh_dev);
> -
> - lwtstate_put(fib_nh->fib_nh_lws);
> + fib_nh_common_release(&fib_nh->nh_common);
> free_nh_exceptions(fib_nh);
> rt_fibinfo_free_cpus(fib_nh->nh_pcpu_rth_output);
> rt_fibinfo_free(&fib_nh->nh_rth_input);
> @@ -462,6 +468,30 @@ static int fib_detect_death(struct fib_info *fi, int order,
> return 1;
> }
>
> +int fib_nh_common_init(struct fib_nh_common *nhc, struct nlattr *encap,
> + u16 encap_type, void *cfg, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + if (encap) {
> + struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (encap_type == LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_NONE) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "LWT encap type not specified");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + err = lwtunnel_build_state(encap_type, encap, nhc->nhc_family,
> + cfg, &lwtstate, extack);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + nhc->nhc_lwtstate = lwtstate_get(lwtstate);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fib_nh_common_init);
> +
> int fib_nh_init(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *nh,
> struct fib_config *cfg, int nh_weight,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> @@ -474,22 +504,10 @@ int fib_nh_init(struct net *net, struct fib_nh *nh,
> if (!nh->nh_pcpu_rth_output)
> goto err_out;
>
> - if (cfg->fc_encap) {
> - struct lwtunnel_state *lwtstate;
> -
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - if (cfg->fc_encap_type == LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_NONE) {
> - NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "LWT encap type not specified");
> - goto lwt_failure;
> - }
> - err = lwtunnel_build_state(cfg->fc_encap_type,
> - cfg->fc_encap, AF_INET, cfg,
> - &lwtstate, extack);
Init of nhc_family should have been part of this patch instead of previous one,
but it's not a big deal.
patch 5 isn't pretty still and you didn't answer my question
why pointer to fib6_flags is worse than duplicated check.
But it's ok to me in this shape, so for the set:
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists