[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHsH6GunW97ge_FAFvxnKYHppL0uA1pz_4wXzs4ejDgdtyweUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:10:33 +0300
From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next 03/11] xfrm: remove input indirection from xfrm_mode
Hi Florian,
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 7:31 PM Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
>
> No need for any indirection or abstraction here, both functions
> are pretty much the same and quite small, they also have no external
> dependencies.
>.
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> index ea5ac053c15d..e3c7edd11e77 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,74 @@ int xfrm_prepare_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_prepare_input);
nit: looks like xfrm_prepare_input() should be static now, no?
Eyal.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists