netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip xfrm: support setting/printing XFRMA_IF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:50:32 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip xfrm: support setting/printing
 XFRMA_IF_ID attribute in states/policies

On 4/5/19 8:57 PM, Antony Antony wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 03:07:58PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Thu,  4 Apr 2019 19:07:38 +0300
>> Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The XFRMA_IF_ID attribute is set in policies/states for them to be
>>> associated with an XFRM interface (4.19+).
>>>
>>> Add support for setting / displaying this attribute.
>>>
>>> Note that 0 is a valid value therefore set XFRMA_IF_ID if any value
>>> was provided in command line.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
>>
>> This is already handled by an earlier patch, that I just applied
> 
> Do you  mean commit 286446c1
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2.git/commit/?id=286446c1e8c7f5f6eca4959015aa9e482b7adb11
> 
> Matt's patch is to support link.  
> e.g ip link add ipsec0 type xfrm dev enp0s5 if_id 0xAB
> 
> Eyal's patch for xfrm state and policy.
> e.g 
> ip xfrm policy add src 10.1.1.200/32 dst 10.1.1.100/32 dir in tmpl src 
> 172.16.1.200 dst 172.16.1.100 proto esp reqid 2 mode tunnel if_id 10
> 
> Thanks for applying Matt's patch. We need for both patches.
> 
> -antony
> 

Stephen: since you took Matt's, I am assuming you will take the xfrm
patch too.