[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874l6wmxpr.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:57:04 -0700
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: TSN: taprio scheduler
Hi,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com> writes:
> From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 21:02:43
>
>> The series that I planning to send this week has some ideas about how to
>> solve all these three points. But for hardware offloading and frame
>> preemption, all I will propose is the interface for talking to the
>> driver.
>
> Was this sent ?
Yes, here's the link to the cover letter of the RFC:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1082982/
>
> I have some setups that support Frame Preemption, EST and Time-Based
> Scheduling.
>
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists