lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190416205212.5cb286fbeec801f50269b2b5@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:52:12 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] mm: Remove the SLAB allocator On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 12:28:16 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:53:34PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > > FWIW, our enterprise kernel use it (latest is 4.12 based), and openSUSE > > > kernels as well (with openSUSE Tumbleweed that includes latest > > > kernel.org stables). AFAIK we don't enable SLAB_DEBUG even in general > > > debug kernel flavours as it's just too slow. > > > > > > IIRC last time Mel evaluated switching to SLUB, it wasn't a clear > > > winner, but I'll just CC him for details :) > > > > > > > We also use CONFIG_SLAB and disable CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG for the same reason. > > Would it be possible to re-evaluate using mainline kernel 5.0? I have vague memories that slab outperforms slub for some networking loads. Could the net folks please comment?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists