[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <299e5bb3-665b-2d3c-fa4c-75466c4a51bf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:36:58 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net/skbuff: don't waste memory reserves
On 04/19/2019 06:17 AM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>
>
> On 4/18/19 9:55 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Are you targeting net or net-next tree ?
>>
>
> I think it's up to Dave to decide where the patches should go. They apply cleanly on both trees.
> The last two patches just minor cleanups so they are definitely net-next material.
>
Not at all, please carefully read
Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst
Q: How do I indicate which tree (net vs. net-next) my patch should be in?
You need to split your patches in two series, not assume that David will manually do
the manual work for you.
Thank you
Powered by blists - more mailing lists