[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9fNBFrKBtbSYiEZeZ5MwzjjSmu1Fz+nAt6anr8Zb6r=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:46:40 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Cc: "<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Masahisa Kojima <masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: socionext: replace napi_alloc_frag with the netdev
variant on init
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 22:24, Ilias Apalodimas
<ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
> > > Use netdev_alloc_frag during the Rx ring setup instead napi_alloc_frag
> > >
> >
> > Why?
> >
> The netdev variant is usable on any context since it disables interrupts.
> The napi variant of the call is supposed to be used under softirq context
> only
>
Helpful, thanks. In general, commit logs need to describe *why* you do
something, since *what* you do is usually obvious from the patch
itself, but why you do it isn't.
With the above clarification added:
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > > index a18149720aa2..cba5881b2746 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c
> > > @@ -673,7 +673,8 @@ static void netsec_process_tx(struct netsec_priv *priv)
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void *netsec_alloc_rx_data(struct netsec_priv *priv,
> > > - dma_addr_t *dma_handle, u16 *desc_len)
> > > + dma_addr_t *dma_handle, u16 *desc_len,
> > > + bool napi)
> > > {
> > > size_t total_len = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> > > size_t payload_len = NETSEC_RX_BUF_SZ;
> > > @@ -682,7 +683,7 @@ static void *netsec_alloc_rx_data(struct netsec_priv *priv,
> > >
> > > total_len += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(payload_len + NETSEC_SKB_PAD);
> > >
> > > - buf = napi_alloc_frag(total_len);
> > > + buf = napi ? napi_alloc_frag(total_len) : netdev_alloc_frag(total_len);
> > > if (!buf)
> > > return NULL;
> > >
> > > @@ -765,7 +766,8 @@ static int netsec_process_rx(struct netsec_priv *priv, int budget)
> > > /* allocate a fresh buffer and map it to the hardware.
> > > * This will eventually replace the old buffer in the hardware
> > > */
> > > - buf_addr = netsec_alloc_rx_data(priv, &dma_handle, &desc_len);
> > > + buf_addr = netsec_alloc_rx_data(priv, &dma_handle, &desc_len,
> > > + true);
> > > if (unlikely(!buf_addr))
> > > break;
> > >
> > > @@ -1069,7 +1071,8 @@ static int netsec_setup_rx_dring(struct netsec_priv *priv)
> > > void *buf;
> > > u16 len;
> > >
> > > - buf = netsec_alloc_rx_data(priv, &dma_handle, &len);
> > > + buf = netsec_alloc_rx_data(priv, &dma_handle, &len,
> > > + false);
> > > if (!buf) {
> > > netsec_uninit_pkt_dring(priv, NETSEC_RING_RX);
> > > goto err_out;
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists