lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:37:32 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] cnic: Refactor code and mark expected switch
 fall-through

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, refactor code a
bit and mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warning:

drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c: In function ‘cnic_cm_process_kcqe’:
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c:4044:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    opcode = L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_CLOSE_COMP;
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c:4050:2: note: here
  case L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_RESET_RECEIVED:
  ^~~~

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
index 510dfc1c236b..57dc3cbff36e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
@@ -4038,15 +4038,14 @@ static void cnic_cm_process_kcqe(struct cnic_dev *dev, struct kcqe *kcqe)
 	case L5CM_RAMROD_CMD_ID_CLOSE: {
 		struct iscsi_kcqe *l5kcqe = (struct iscsi_kcqe *) kcqe;
 
-		if (l4kcqe->status != 0 || l5kcqe->completion_status != 0) {
-			netdev_warn(dev->netdev, "RAMROD CLOSE compl with status 0x%x completion status 0x%x\n",
-				    l4kcqe->status, l5kcqe->completion_status);
-			opcode = L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_CLOSE_COMP;
-			/* Fall through */
-		} else {
+		if (l4kcqe->status == 0 && l5kcqe->completion_status == 0)
 			break;
-		}
+
+		netdev_warn(dev->netdev, "RAMROD CLOSE compl with status 0x%x completion status 0x%x\n",
+			    l4kcqe->status, l5kcqe->completion_status);
+		opcode = L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_CLOSE_COMP;
 	}
+		/* Fall through */
 	case L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_RESET_RECEIVED:
 	case L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_CLOSE_COMP:
 	case L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_RESET_COMP:
-- 
2.21.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists