[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190426.112946.1319839231077035351.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:29:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gustavo@...eddedor.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] cnic: Refactor code and mark expected switch
fall-through
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:37:32 -0500
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, refactor code a
> bit and mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c: In function ‘cnic_cm_process_kcqe’:
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c:4044:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> opcode = L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_CLOSE_COMP;
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c:4050:2: note: here
> case L4_KCQE_OPCODE_VALUE_RESET_RECEIVED:
> ^~~~
>
> Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists