[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9FB6B9CF-1767-4598-8859-C5D8A47DEC85@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 21:20:03 +0000
From: Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
CC: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sched: Introduce act_ctinfo action
> On 30 Apr 2019, at 22:47, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:08 AM Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
> <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>> ctinfo is a new tc filter action module. It is designed to restore DSCPs
>> stored in conntrack marks into the ipv4/v6 diffserv field.
>
> I think we can retrieve any information from conntrack with such
> a general name, including skb mark. So, as you already pick the
> name ctinfo, please make it general rather than just DSCP.
> You can add skb mark into your ctinfo too so that act_connmark
> can be just replaced.
Hi Cong,
Thanks for the review, I have a v2 in progress addressing that along
with another silly that got through. I’m also re-working the stats
reporting to return act_ctinfo stats instead of usurping the dropped,
overlimits & dropped figures.
>
> Your patch looks fine from a quick galance, please make sure
> you run checkpatch.pl to keep your coding style aligned to Linux
> kernel's, at least I don't think we accept C++ style comments.
This time I’ll remember to run checkpatch before I submit instead of
after :-)
>
> Thanks.
Cheers,
Kevin D-B
gpg: 012C ACB2 28C6 C53E 9775 9123 B3A2 389B 9DE2 334A
Powered by blists - more mailing lists