lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190503064618.GM17989@gauss3.secunet.de> Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 08:46:18 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> To: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com> CC: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC HACK] xfrm: make state refcounting percpu On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 06:34:29AM +0000, Vakul Garg wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> > > > > Also, is this a new problem or was it always like that? > > It is always like this. On 4-core, 8-core platforms as well, these atomics consume significant cpu > (8 core cpu usage is more than 4 core). Ok, so it is not a regression. That's what I wanted to know. Did the patch from Florian improve the situation?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists